Received: from mgmt.utoronto.ca (fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca [128.100.43.253]) by mail3.texas.net (8.8.8/2.4) with SMTP id KAA18374 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:43:47 -0600 (CST) Received: by mgmt.utoronto.ca (5.65v4.0/1.1.10.7/26Jan98-0432AM) id AA06427; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:37:36 -0500 From: LouisFors@aol.com Message-Id: <7ab18f4a.34f4489e@aol.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:36:44 EST To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: # 452: musings Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 49 Sender: owner-emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Precedence: bulk Reply-To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: 1e067bd6e60c2a36ffb770cc1fb29b3b Along with Jed and lots of others, I've been pondering #452. I don't have any clear answers, and there might not be any, but I'm musing: 1. Why does ED pick the prize--the jewel of the search--to be a pearl?. Why not a nugget or a diamond? Does she elect the ocean because it is so vast, a place she can genuinely fear? Does she want the prize to be white, as she is, to contrast with the dusky one? Or, see item 3 below: is it a great setting for sexual reverberations? 2. An extra-textual query: how did ED, react to the slavery issue? The complete letters indicate a date of c.1862 for the poem, which would place it during the War Between the States. 3. For me there is a very strong sexual undertow to the poem. My Rorschach? In ED's time would "bore my jewel -Home" reverberate sexually? And the sea was "unsanctified - to touch -" Wild image: the sea to be avoided because it is impure, and unholy? Overwhelming, yes. Impure and unholy? I can't go back over ED's numerous references to the sea, but there a lot of them. I suspect the lexicon people have a good handle on the meanings of the sea for ED, but I should be able to deal with the problem from this text alone. Well, musings, my temporary $00.02 Louis Forsdale