Received: from mgmt.utoronto.ca (fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca [128.100.43.253]) by mail1.texas.net (8.8.8/2.4) with SMTP id QAA29440 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 16:58:33 -0600 (CST) Received: by mgmt.utoronto.ca (5.65v4.0/1.1.10.7/26Jan98-0432AM) id AA04042; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:52:56 -0500 From: LouisFors Message-Id: <2ec08296.34fb3831@aol.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:52:30 EST To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Chicken of the Sea Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 64 Sender: owner-emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Precedence: bulk Reply-To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: 29bee183810a042287b91dcf0adc8d78 In a message dated 98-03-02 16:47:37 EST, Jinpeng wrote: > > > [Jed:] > > Does the "being" of nature poems somehow exclude sex? > > > [Jinpeng:] > No. Indeed, sex is a most important part of nature, scientifically > speaking. Jinpeng: You carefully restrict your response to "scientifically speaking." That appears to be an important qualification for you. Could you say a bit more about your thought? Or, do I make too much of those two words? cheers, Louis Forsdale