Received: from mgmt.utoronto.ca (fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca [128.100.43.253]) by news.giganews.com (8.8.8/2.4) with SMTP id RAA02630 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:00:01 -0600 (CST) Received: by mgmt.utoronto.ca (5.65v4.0/1.1.10.7/26Jan98-0432AM) id AA24901; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:57:56 -0500 From: LouisFors Message-Id: <26c55ac2.351d806e@aol.com> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:57:48 EST To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ED: Universally admired today? Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 49 Sender: owner-emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Precedence: bulk Reply-To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-UIDL: c4aeafe2d2572e4f6786d0842f740ad2 In a message dated 98-03-28 16:37:12 EST, you write: > Subj: Re: ED: Universally admired today? > Date: 98-03-28 16:37:12 EST > From: tanter@econs.umass.edu (tanter) > Sender: owner-emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca > Reply-to: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca > To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca > > At 03:30 PM 3/28/98 -0500, Marcy responded to Louis's question. Yes, Marcy, your comment is very helpful. I probably am asking the wrong question, but I think you got my drift. So, merci from the high, dry, and pollen-filled (allergies are ghastly) deserts of the great Southwest. Louis Forsdale > >But it's not a rhetorical question, Jinpeng. I'm really curious. I guess > I > >assume that somewhere there may be pockets of criticism that challenge ED's > >place. If ED is universally accepted as a great poet by American scholars, > >then is the same true of, say, European scholars, or Asian scholars? I > admit > >that it may be a naive question, but it's genuine. > > > Maybe you're asking the wrong question, Louis. I think it is univerally > acknowledged that she's not the worst poet and I think most people who > appreciate poetry, scholar and non-scholar, would say that she has her > moments of greatness. (she certainly isn't great all the time!) That said, > in Britain, for example, she's not a great priority in university English > depts. My brother-in-law went through an American lit degree and barely > read any ED (they used the Norton anthology and that's it), we had a PhD > student on here a year or so ago who was at the University of Leeds and was > frustrated because none of her profs knew much about ED. There is a woman > at the University of East Anglia whose published a book on ED, Helen > McNeil, and I don't know of another ED scholar over there, tho' I assume > there must be some (I'd actually like to know about them, if any are > listening!). Students in secondary school get some ED occasionally but not > always. In Australia, there are almost no people who work on ED--my friend > Joan Kirkby is the only one I know of plus Lori Lebow who's doing a PhD, > and then we have a few men from Oz who are on emweb but I think they're > grad students too?? (Andrew?? correct me, please!). Jinpeng teaches in > China and we know how he hates ED (ha ha) but she is widely prized in > Japan, where she has a big following. I don't know of anyone in India or > the former USSR or Africa. I'm sure the more senior scholars here know > many more people than I do. > > Is that helpful? > > Marcy > > >