Received: from fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca (fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca [128.100.43.253])
          by tapehost.texas.net (8.8.8/2.4) with ESMTP
	  id IAA13529 for <pridgen@texas.net>; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 08:18:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) id JAA01634
	for emweb-outgoing; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 09:15:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca: majordom set sender to owner-emweb@mgmt.utoronto.ca using -f
From: LouisFors <LouisFors@aol.com>
Message-ID: <27e082af.354484d3@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 09:14:58 EDT
To: emweb@fmgmt.mgmt.utoronto.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Forgery
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 49
Sender: owner-emweb@mgmt.utoronto.ca
Precedence: list
Reply-To: emweb@mgmt.utoronto.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-UIDL: 0c2587a4b145cd3becf7f3209b29ddf7

Mike wrote:

>  The fake didn't have that, what was it? - ah yes - PANACHE (a 
>  mexican pastry?) or perhaps sublimity. It didn't have the contrariness of 
>  Dickinson - yea that's it!

Mike:
FLASH!

While scientists have been searching for a theory that explains everything, a
little group of hard working Emwebbers have been narrowing multiple factors
down, finally arriving at a trinity:  panache, sublimity, contrariness.  But
can that be expressed mathematically?  Or should the question be:  can their
work be expressed in lyric poetry.  Ah, there's the challenge.  

Louis