|
Hadley-
June 27. '96.
My dear Susan -
It seemed to me that
you, above all others, ought to know
just what was said publicly, at
that time + in that place, of y'r
husband. The rough little ms. I sent
you was a sketch written beforehand
of I thought ought to be said.
In speaking I varied the language
very little, in thought not at all. If,
you noticed the abominable report in
the "Republican" you saw how
atrociously it altered, added + sub-
tracted. The one sentence it made me
impute to Austin, as a conspicuous
trait in his character, what I expressly
emphatically declared did not belong
to him but was utterly foreign, distasteful
and impossible to him. In another I
|
|
was represented as guilty of
the paltry platitude that he
was "Sometimes impatient with his
sickness"-! Sic!, thereby turning
what followed in the whole para-
graph into an absurdity. What I said was
that he himself was sometimes impatient
at "himself". Considering the subject,
the company, the semi-official occasion,
the responsibility of the speaker, to
say nothing more, such a newspaper
travesty is unpardonable. The sore-
ness of it hangs about me like a
sprained ankle, a cut sinew, or
a gash in the face. It has half
spoiled the week of peace here. Last
year it was very much so. I took great
pains to furnish an exact written copy
of my tribute to Ar'r [Arthur] Seeley. It was
mutilated + mangled. In both cases
the speech was made at the request of
the authorities of the College for its
benefit, cheerfully + with goodwill.
|
|
The Republican's reporter for such an Institution + such a
celebration ought to be a man of some sense, some idea of
literary art, + some skill in reproducing what he hears.
For some cause that I never understood (tho' I have
an opinion) the younger Bowles has always either had
a grudge or a spite in my behalf. I was his father's friend,
the friend of his editorship fr. the beginning. As sons of the
Valley + neighbors we had much in common, without agreeing
on all subjects. First + last I have said kind things about
the Rep. I suppose enough to fill one of its pages. I take it every
Summer, + pay my subscription in advance, tho' my religious
Hadley neighbors have dropped it for the "Union" on acc't of
its radicalism. It is not strange that it dislikes me.
I somewhat dislike myself. Its prejudice appears in
|
|
its treatment. Probably Mr. B's subordinates are
instructed accordingly. They never lose an opportunity
to originate or repeat flings at the church to which
I belong, + for wh., I left the Unitarians, tho' they treat
other denominations fairly. That is the liberality of the
Liberals, - of which species of toleration I have seen a
great deal. - All this is of small account. But I did
imagine that as Austin's personal friend the Republican, i.e.
Mr. Bowles, w'd see that justice was done to his memory.
I wish Martha's poetry c'd have gone into my small
Eulogy. She has the divine gift. "The silent [?] [away?]" +
"So late- outsleep the birds", + "his forest heart[?]", are very fine.
With love faithfully,
F.D.H.
|
Papers of Susan Dickinson, Box II, Series A, Brown University Libraries
|
[envelope]
Mrs. Susan H. Dickinson -
Amherst -
Mass.
|