MANUSCRIPTS: There are two fair copies. That reproduced above, in packet 88 (Bingham 53a), was written in 1865. The other copy (H B 193), written about 1872, is incorporated in a note to Sue:
A narrow Fellow in the GrassA question mark is here substituted for the dash in line 3, and two words are variant:
4. sudden] instant The note to Sue makes no comment about the poem. It merely says:
Loo and Fanny will come tonight, but need that make a difference? Space is as the Presence-Thus one learns that the cousins Louise and Frances Norcross were expected, and infers that Sue had just sent a note to inquire whether she might make an evening call and whether ED would send her a copy of the poem, which she obviously knew well. PUBLICATION: This is the poem which, titled "The Snake," had been anonymously published on 14 February 1866 in the columns of the Springfield Daily Republican. The fact that Sue lacked a copy tends to confirm the conjecture that it was Sue who had forwarded her own copy to Samuel Bowles because he had expressed his admiration for it. "How did that girl ever know that a boggy field wasn't good for corn?" he is reported to have exclaimed (FF, 27). The impression that Sue's copy was used is strengthened by ED's comment to T. W. Higginson in a letter to him, postmarked 17 March 1866. She evidently enclosed a clipping from the Republican, protesting:
Lest you meet my Snake and suppose I deceive it was robbed of me-defeated too of the third line by the punctuation. The third and fourth were one-I had told you I did not print-I feared you might think me ostensible.No copy of "The Snake" survives among the Higginson papers, but the inference is inescapable that she must have sent him a copy since he would otherwise not have penetrated the anonymity of the published poem. The Republican had printed the poem as three 8-line stanzas and had rendered the third and fourth lines
You may have met himOtherwise the text conforms to that of the packet copy. When the poem was again issued in Poems (1891), 142-143, titled "The Snake," the editors followed the packet copy by the readings "sudden" (line 4) and "Yet" (line 11), but they too introduced a comma at the end of line 3:
You may have met him,In CP (1924), and in all subsequent gatherings, the reading of the lines compounded the error by substituting a question mark for the final comma in line 3:
You may have met him,The 1872 version to Sue makes perfectly clear ED's intention regarding the way she expected the lines to be read. Two words were altered in Poems (1891) and later printings:
11. Boy] child
dickinson/higginson correspondence main page | dickinson electronic archives main menu
|